"Mike Hyndman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:dvukir$cpg$1$(E-Mail Removed)...
> My school is hoping to buy and install a W2003 server to act as a domain
> controller for a small school network.
> The network currently consists of 18 cat 5 wired XPPro PCs and a number (>
> than a dozen)of XPro laptops and W98 PC's connected to the network
> wirelessly. The network also has an old NT4 machine (steam driven!) acting
> as a central file sharer, which we hope to replace with the new server. At
You can still keep the NT4 box as a File Server. It is perfectly suited for
such a task and it lets you take advantage of the hardware you have,...there
is no sense in getting rid of something that can do that job it is doing
perfectly fine. Then you will have two servers instead of just one and you
won't have kids storing "crap" on the Domain controller and screwing it up.
> Question, re users and groups, can a user be a group? We would like to
have
> each year group (one log in name and password) log on as a user and to
have
> access to all that year groups folders and only the applications they
> require to use during the school day. We thought about having each child
log
> on individually but it would be a nightmare having to remember all their
> passwords when they "conveniently" forget them.
You don't have to remember them and are not even supposed to keep records of
them. If they forget them you change their password to a "default" password
and set the system to force them to change it to something else on the first
login. If you keep password records then they are never accountable for
what happens with their accounts because they can claim that since records
are kept, anyone who has access to the records could use those credentials
to do something "evil" instead of them doing it themselves. There is the
"real world",...and then there are Lawyers and "Rights Activists"
Also when they forget the password they get to write 100 times on the board
after school:
"I will not forget my password,..I will not give my password to other
people"
"I will not forget my password,..I will not give my password to other
people"
"I will not forget my password,..I will not give my password to other
people"
"I will not forget my password,..I will not give my password to other
people"
.......................
And then there is:
"I will not hack the School's records and change my grades"
"I will not hack the School's records and change my grades"
"I will not hack the School's records and change my grades"
"I will not hack the School's records and change my grades"
.......................................
Without individual passwords and accounts, with the student being the *only*
one knowing their own password, there will be no accountability for what
they do. If they give their pasword out to someone who then misuses it,..it
is still thier fault for giving it out in the first place.
> Does WS2003 allow for logging in from multiple locations with the same ID,
> password etc.
You can log in as many times with the same account as you want. The number
of Locations is adjustable, but by default there is no limit.
> Would there be any issues regarding the wireless part of the network?
There are always issues with Wireless Networks. They are, by nature,
insecure. They can be made mostly secure, but you have to work at it. If
you want your LAN hacked and abused by kids, go ahead and deploy it in its
default unsecured state. ;-)
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com