802.11g repeater repeating a repeater

hi!

Can a Linksys 802.11G AP in repeater mode repeat a
repeated signal?

i.e.

[AP] <---> [repeater] <---> [repeater] <---> [client]

i'd assume the speed would be halved once again if
it's possible...


thanks!


--

eug k wrote:

> hi!
>
> Can a Linksys 802.11G AP in repeater mode repeat a
> repeated signal?
>
> i.e.
>
> [AP] <---> [repeater] <---> [repeater] <---> [client]

Yes, it works. It the principle behind all the community wireless networks
that are springing up.

> i'd assume the speed would be halved once again if
> it's possible...
>

Speed is about the same but latency will be longer.


gtoomey
www.ausinvestor.com Australian Investor Forum

"eug k" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:cag7u2$37l$(E-Mail Removed)...
> hi!
>
> Can a Linksys 802.11G AP in repeater mode repeat a
> repeated signal?
>
> i.e.
>
> [AP] <---> [repeater] <---> [repeater] <---> [client]
>
> i'd assume the speed would be halved once again if
> it's possible...

If it halved then it wouldn't be a repeater would it. The whole purpose of
a repeater is to pick up a weak signal and repeat it at full power.

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking Uncle Bully <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> "eug k" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:cag7u2$37l$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> hi!
>>
>> Can a Linksys 802.11G AP in repeater mode repeat a
>> repeated signal?
>>
>> i.e.
>>
>> [AP] <---> [repeater] <---> [repeater] <---> [client]
>>
>> i'd assume the speed would be halved once again if
>> it's possible...
>
> If it halved then it wouldn't be a repeater would it. The whole purpose of
> a repeater is to pick up a weak signal and repeat it at full power.

that is how a normal FDM-based [normally] passive repeater works. Receive the
RF signal, amplify it, and retransmit it at full power... no processing done.

wifi repeaters are active and TDM-based, which means that half the time
it's receiving and half the time it's transmitting on the same freq ranges
because there's only one transceiver. it stores the data after receiving,
and forwards it in the next frame. So the net result is, your speed is
halved.

(fdm = frequency division multiplexing, tdm = time division multiplexing)


--

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking Gregory Toomey <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> eug k wrote:
>
>> hi!
>>
>> Can a Linksys 802.11G AP in repeater mode repeat a
>> repeated signal?
>>
>> i.e.
>>
>> [AP] <---> [repeater] <---> [repeater] <---> [client]
>
> Yes, it works. It the principle behind all the community wireless networks
> that are springing up.

excellent, thanks!


>> i'd assume the speed would be halved once again if
>> it's possible...
>>
>
> Speed is about the same but latency will be longer.

hm, are you sure? how would it get around the inherent speed-halving
of the store-and-forward method?



--

eug k wrote:


> hm, are you sure? how would it get around the inherent speed-halving
> of the store-and-forward method?
>

TCP/IP is a sliding window protocol. You keep on sending packets af full
speed, and the receiver sends ACK (acknowledgemets) back. There can be
quite a delay betweend sending a packet and sending the acknowledgment, and
many packets in the "pipeline".

See
http://www.efd.lth.se/~d92pa/SUB/Lin...er/node57.html


gtoomey
www.ausinvestor.com Australian Investor Forum

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.networking Gregory Toomey <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> eug k wrote:
>
>> hm, are you sure? how would it get around the inherent speed-halving
>> of the store-and-forward method?
>>
>
> TCP/IP is a sliding window protocol. You keep on sending packets af full
> speed, and the receiver sends ACK (acknowledgemets) back. There can be
> quite a delay betweend sending a packet and sending the acknowledgment, and
> many packets in the "pipeline".

yes, but APs only have one radio, so they can only transmit on
one channel at once. So in repeater mode, it receives it, stores
it, and retransmits it

Just found a site that explains it well:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/...g/br350ch1.htm

(or)

http://tinyurl.com/35e9s

check figure 1-4, Repeater Bridge.


What I wanted was confirmation that it works with the linksys
in particular. Looks like it probably will!

Hooking up two APs back to back will solve the bandwidth
issue, but that'll double the costs.


thanks


--

eug k <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> that is how a normal FDM-based [normally] passive repeater works.
> Receive the
> RF signal, amplify it, and retransmit it at full power... no
> processing done.
>
> wifi repeaters are active and TDM-based, which means that half the
> time
> it's receiving and half the time it's transmitting on the same freq
> ranges
> because there's only one transceiver. it stores the data after
> receiving,
> and forwards it in the next frame. So the net result is, your speed is
> halved.
>
> (fdm = frequency division multiplexing, tdm = time division
> multiplexing)

But the halving of receive and transmit would occur whether or not you had a
repeater or not. That is to say if you had just a single base station, it
would spend half of its time receiving data and the other half transmitting
it. The halving of the bandwidth has already occurred at the first hop. Just
adding additional access points is simply going to add latency to the
signal, but it won't reduce bandwidth.

Yousuf Khan

In aus.computers Yousuf Khan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> eug k <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> that is how a normal FDM-based [normally] passive repeater works.
>> Receive the
>> RF signal, amplify it, and retransmit it at full power... no
>> processing done.
>>
>> wifi repeaters are active and TDM-based, which means that half the
>> time
>> it's receiving and half the time it's transmitting on the same freq
>> ranges
>> because there's only one transceiver. it stores the data after
>> receiving,
>> and forwards it in the next frame. So the net result is, your speed is
>> halved.
>>
>> (fdm = frequency division multiplexing, tdm = time division
>> multiplexing)
>
> But the halving of receive and transmit would occur whether or not you had a
> repeater or not. That is to say if you had just a single base station, it
> would spend half of its time receiving data and the other half transmitting
> it. The halving of the bandwidth has already occurred at the first hop. Just
> adding additional access points is simply going to add latency to the
> signal, but it won't reduce bandwidth.

That would be true if all the additional access points did were to receive
the RF signal, amplify it, and retransmit it. But that is not what happens.

As you've said, wifi is half-duplex. The second access point receives a frame
from the first, stores it, switches to transmit, reads it, then transmits it.
The halving occurs on every hop. The net result is half the bandwidth
and increased latency at each hop.

This is well-documented and widely known, e.g. in the cisco link i posted earlier
in this thread.

one way to get around it is to use two APs back-to-back. But that would double
the costs.




--