On 2005-12-14, idiotprogrammer <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Don't know what I want yet, but I know what I want to avoid--wireless
> problems!
>
> I tried using ndiswrapper on an AMD 64 bit machine with many wifi
> adaptors, only to find that ndiswrapper required 64 bit drivers (I was
> working on amd). Many of the vendors for wifi adaptors had only 32 bit
> drivers.
>
> When buying a new machine, I'll probably prefer a 64 bit solution,
> but not if it's impossible to find 64 bit drivers for any of the Wifi
> cards!
>
> Is the best alternative to seek a 32 bit Intel cpu?
I think the best alternative is to seek a wireless adapter that has
native support in the linux kernel, so that you can build your own
driver and avoid ndiswrapper altogether. There are a good many out
there--google and other sites should help you find a compatible card.
--keith
--
kkeller-(E-Mail Removed)
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
see X- headers for PGP signature information