Linksys seems pretty good.
I have a WAG54G, which is rock solid running NAT , but won't support
NON-NAT setup properly.
I installed some Linksys cards for someone, and haven't heard that he's
been having problems with it.
George
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:cg4e19$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi everyone
>
> I appreciate topics like this have probably been raised before but any
> views or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Having searched for
> information I feel more confused about everything now than before even
> So I hope nobody minds another thread asking for help.
>
> At the moment I have a D-Link DI-614 router and DSL-300+ modem. I am
> thinking of getting an "all in one" ADSL modem and router with
wireless
> capabilities - i.e. D-Link DSL-G604T, Linksys WAG54G-UK or Netgear
> DG834G. Ideally I would like a wireless PCI card to go with this unit
> and figured an adaptor from the same company should surely make life
> easier Of course having read about all the cards I'm not getting a
> favourable impression of any. So your opinion on which router-modem
> unit to get and wireless card would be most appreciated.
>
> Owning a DI-614 I figure the D-Link DSL-G604T is going to have a
> similar interface. Apperantly Netgear tech-support is virtually
> non-existant and while D-Link take time, you can actually get help. I
> have no experience with Linksys.
>
> For the PCI cards I was looking at the D-Link DWL-G520/DWL-G520+,
> Netgear WG311 or Linksys WMP54GS-UK. Well, the Netgear PCI card seems
> to randomly reboot computers and freezes a lot. The D-Link does the
> same and conflicts with Creative soundcards and I have a Audigy 2 ZS
> PCI card. I don't know anything about the Linksys one.
>
> If anybody is happy with the DWL-G520 then please let me know. I am
> open to suggestions about whichever combination is best. At the moment
> though my head is getting dizzy from trying to work out which is best
>
> Thanks in advance for the help!
>
> As a sidenote, I will be doing data-transfer between machines and
> downloading; so it will be for more than just "casual" browsing every
> so often.
>
|