Thanks for the reply.
Im going to remove the entries and see if they reappear
before trying the wins replication again.
Once this is done is it work getting both domains DNS
replcating to each other via secondary Zones and
transfers, I belive that this will probably create alot
of not really needed traffic.
I may even just stick static Wins entries pointing to
each others servers and manually added DNS host entries.
Im not sure if the bosses will want full interdomain
browsing. they will probably just want drive mappings to
the servers across the vpn which is fine with the above
static entries and a trust relationship set up between
the domains .
>-----Original Message-----
>You sure you weren't mistaking the logged on user of the
machine as the
>machine name?
>
>It isn't going to give a duplicate name error if there
wasn't a duplicate
>name somewhere. If in doubt you can always
delete "suspect" entries from
>both WINS servers. It if is a legitiment entry it will
reenter itself after
>a while. Also keep in mind that any dialup or VPN users
will also end up in
>the WINS server if their dialup settings (DHCP or
otherwise) include a WINS
>server, so these users are not allowed to have their
machines named the same
>as any other machine on the system either.
>
>
>--
>
>Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
>www.wandtv.com
>
>
>"Jason Blake" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote in message
>news:16b601c3fbcb$2e7ea350$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> No there is no machines on either network called
>> administrator
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Well let's make this simple...
>> >Is there a machine on each LAN called "Administrator"?
>> >
>> >If yes, change one or both of them. That is not a very
>> good name for a
>> >machine anyway and is always going to cause confusion.
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
>> >www.wandtv.com
>> >
>> >
>> >"Jason Blake" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote in message
>> >news:11fa01c3fb81$2f376ba0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> >> Ive just set UP a LAN to LAN VPN via 2 Hardware
>> firewalls
>> >> and was trying to to get Push/Pull Wins replication
to
>> >> work between the two seperate domains Wins servers.
One
>> >> is a 2003 Server domain the other is a 2000 Server
>> >> domain. Replication did not happen and on one site
the
>> >> 4320 error
>> >> appeared in the event log "Another machine has sent
a
>> >> name release message to this machine probably
because a
>> >> duplicate name has been detected on the TCP network.
>> >> The IP address of the node that sent the message is
in
>> >> the data.
>> >> Use nbtstat -n in a command window to see which name
>> >> is in the Conflict state".
>> >>
>> >> Doing the NBTSTAT -n command the table showed a
>> conflict
>> >> on an entry with the machine name of ADMINISTRATOR
and
>> a
>> >> public IP address that is nothing to do with our
>> company
>> >> at all. I could ping this ADMINISTRATOR address and
>> got a
>> >> reply. Does anyone no why this is the case ?
>> >> The above was done yesterday. An nbtstat -n command
>> this
>> >> morning shows no such conflict but there is a
>> >> ADMINISTRATOR entry. Looking at both Servers Wins
>> >> databases. The site that did have the conflict does
>> have
>> >> an entry for ADMINISTRATOR, the type is 03h
messenger
>> and
>> >> The Ipaddress and owner is the ip of the Server
itself.
>> >> We also have a ADMINISTRATOR entry here same 03h
type
>> but
>> >> the ipaddress is a LAN PC but the owner is the
server.
>> >>
>> >> Can anyone offer any assistance ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >
>
>
>.
>
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
