"CNewsReader" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sorry for being so confusing. 2 nics in 1 2003 server. each has an IP
> address as stated below. 1 ip per nic 2 per server.
One nic per subnet! It doesn't matter how many IP#s there are,..one subnet
is one subnet.
If you want a second "data network":
1. It is arguable that the amount of data flow warrents the second network
for efficiency,...most of the time it does not justify it. In my opinion
(everyone has one), doing this stuff is usually based on superstition rather
than the reality of being needed.
2. The second Nic must be in a different subnet which is determined by the
IP# and Mask used. It also must be physically separated at the physical
level (the cabling).
3. Measures must be taken to insure that the server is properly
identified/resolved to the correct IP#/Nic when a connection is made to it
for the correct purpose. This can be done by accessing by the second IP# or
by a different "Name" that is resolved to the correct IP# by a Hosts File, a
static WINS Record, or by adding an "A" Record in DNS for this purpose.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------