On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:22:26 -0500, Kradorex Xeron <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have a situation where I have one NIC connected to a switch on a server,
>and two internet connections on the switch, before I continue, I don't need
>channel bonding and I don't need load balencing because that's not what I
>need nor want.
>
>Here's my physical configuration (Best viewed in monospace font):
>
> <CONNECTION 1>---[ISP 1]
> |
> [NAT]
> |
><SERVER>-------[SWITCH] (note: Both NAT routers are on the same subnet)
> |
> [NAT]
> |
> <CONNECTION 2>---[ISP 2]
>
>The server is only able to route out one connection or the other at the
>moment. Basically what I want is for the server to be able to route out the
>connection it came in on. I wish for this to have the least impacting
>solution on the system possible.
>
>Thank you,
I suspect that you would have far better results if you eliminated the
two NATs so that the two external IPs are present on the switch.
If Pascal's three approaches do not accomplish what you want, I urge
you to post this message - plus details about SERVER - to the LARTC
mailing list.
--
buck
|