2 Network cards and Mozilla problem.

Hi,

I have a cable nic (eth0) and a linksys wireless card (eth1) which I
eventually managed to get working using driveloader and ndiswrapper
(despite the broadcom problems). Hooray.

I can ping the wireless router (192.168.0.1) and the router assigned
my wireless card the address 192.168.0.100 and dns addresses
194.168.4.100 and 194.168.8.100 (dns adrdresses of my isp) as set up
in the DHCP info. This was all fine.

I'd like mozilla (and ximian) to use the wireless card to connect to
the internet instead of the cable nic. It won't. I know that there was
a post very similar to this just a few days ago but it didn't deal
with the issue of 2 cards. I've also disabled the cable nic with no
such luck.

I'd also like to initialise this wireless card on startup. I'm using
fedora core 1. Should I put the insmod command in the rc.local file?

Any ideas very welcome

Many thanks,

Richard

Just set eth1 as the default route, and use a network route
on your eth0 segment.

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 07:11:04 -0800, Richard Pain wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a cable nic (eth0) and a linksys wireless card (eth1) which I
> eventually managed to get working using driveloader and ndiswrapper
> (despite the broadcom problems). Hooray.
>
> I can ping the wireless router (192.168.0.1) and the router assigned
> my wireless card the address 192.168.0.100 and dns addresses
> 194.168.4.100 and 194.168.8.100 (dns adrdresses of my isp) as set up
> in the DHCP info. This was all fine.
>
> I'd like mozilla (and ximian) to use the wireless card to connect to
> the internet instead of the cable nic. It won't. I know that there was
> a post very similar to this just a few days ago but it didn't deal
> with the issue of 2 cards. I've also disabled the cable nic with no
> such luck.
>
> I'd also like to initialise this wireless card on startup. I'm using
> fedora core 1. Should I put the insmod command in the rc.local file?
>
> Any ideas very welcome
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Richard