2 IP Addresses 1 Nic card

I am rebuilding my Win 2003 server after a primary hard drive failure.
I have 1 NIC card and 1 exteranal IP address and 1 internal IP address. This
is a setup that I had working before the crash.
Currently I am not getting DNS resolution out.
My configuration is a public IP with the gateway address set, and currently
3 dns servers set. (I have verified serval times that they are the correct
ones)
I have a private 192.168 based IP configured as a second address.
When I view the local area connection status dialog (by clicking the icon in
the tray)
It tells me that I have an IP address of 192.168.32.105 which is th correct
private adddres and then it shows the gate way and dns addresses I set with
the public IP.

So, for my first guess as to what is wrong is that it is binding the gate
way and the dns to the internal IP and trying to route out through it.
Reasonable? and if so, how would I got about fixing it?
If not, well any suggestions as to what might be hapening here?

Of course, just as soon I post this, I get it working... sigh.
"Don Glover" wrote:

> I am rebuilding my Win 2003 server after a primary hard drive failure.
> I have 1 NIC card and 1 exteranal IP address and 1 internal IP address. This
> is a setup that I had working before the crash.
> Currently I am not getting DNS resolution out.
> My configuration is a public IP with the gateway address set, and currently
> 3 dns servers set. (I have verified serval times that they are the correct
> ones)
> I have a private 192.168 based IP configured as a second address.
> When I view the local area connection status dialog (by clicking the icon in
> the tray)
> It tells me that I have an IP address of 192.168.32.105 which is th correct
> private adddres and then it shows the gate way and dns addresses I set with
> the public IP.
>
> So, for my first guess as to what is wrong is that it is binding the gate
> way and the dns to the internal IP and trying to route out through it.
> Reasonable? and if so, how would I got about fixing it?
> If not, well any suggestions as to what might be hapening here?