Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Networks > What Is It With 192.168 And Private Networks?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

What Is It With 192.168 And Private Networks?

 
 
(PeteCresswell)
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-24-2011, 07:39 PM
Is there a reason why I can't make my private network addresses
10.0.0.x?

I note that Apple's "AirPort" defaults to a "10" series address.

After reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network I come
away thinking that 10.x is a "Single Class A" network... but I
can't figure out what the implications are.
--
PeteCresswell
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Brian Cryer
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-25-2011, 08:42 AM
On 24/01/2011 20:39, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
> Is there a reason why I can't make my private network addresses
> 10.0.0.x?
>
> I note that Apple's "AirPort" defaults to a "10" series address.
>
> After reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network I come
> away thinking that 10.x is a "Single Class A" network... but I
> can't figure out what the implications are.


Yes, you can use 10.0.0.x for your private network.

You can use anything in the range:
10.x.x.x
172.16.x.x-172.31.x.x
192.168.x.x

I've worked in both the 19 and 192 range for private networks. Never
seen the 172 one use, but I'm sure its used somewhere.

Most domestic routers come pre-configured assuming 192.168.x.x, but
there is no reason you can't use 10.0.0.x if you want to. This shouldn't
cause you any problems because its a range defined for the use of
private networks.

As for the 10.x.x.x being a class A network, that simply refers to the
address range - in this case 10.x.x.x. If you want to use 10.0.0.x you
are simply using part of that address range. No problem there.

Hope this helps.
--
Brian Cryer
http://www.cryer.co.uk
 
Reply With Quote
 
(PeteCresswell)
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-25-2011, 01:35 PM
Per Brian Cryer:
>As for the 10.x.x.x being a class A network, that simply refers to the
>address range - in this case 10.x.x.x. If you want to use 10.0.0.x you
>are simply using part of that address range. No problem there.
>
>Hope this helps.


Thanks. Did the deed last nite.

Even smoked out a couple of devices with self-set IP addrs in the
process.

I was just a little leery of the "Class A" qualification....
--
PeteCresswell
 
Reply With Quote
 
Michael Bednarek
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-27-2011, 01:35 AM
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:35:32 -0500, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote in
microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless:

>Per Brian Cryer:
>>As for the 10.x.x.x being a class A network, that simply refers to the
>>address range - in this case 10.x.x.x. If you want to use 10.0.0.x you
>>are simply using part of that address range. No problem there.
>>
>>Hope this helps.

>
>Thanks. Did the deed last nite.
>
>Even smoked out a couple of devices with self-set IP addrs in the
>process.
>
>I was just a little leery of the "Class A" qualification....


I would be reluctant to apply a netmask of 255.0.0.0 to my home 10.x.x.x
network; after all, I don't expect to need 16,777,216 nodes on my
network. Instead, I use 10.0.0.x with a netmask of 255.255.255.0.

Using the Class A network 10.x.x.x may also introduce routing problems
where ISPs use that range for their internal routing, a practice common
with 3G cellular internet providers.

--
Michael Bednarek http://mbednarek.com/ "POST NO BILLS"
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Private Networks for Higher Security International Alliance Privacy Services Windows Networking 0 01-26-2009 02:55 AM
Private Networks for Higher Security International Alliance Privacy Services Wireless Internet 0 01-26-2009 02:07 AM
Router with two private networks Ted B Network Routers 1 01-12-2007 08:32 AM
Connecting two private networks Simon Kissane Linux Networking 5 02-10-2006 11:23 PM
forwarding between private and public networks Tobias Skytte Linux Networking 2 11-11-2003 08:22 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11