On Oct 29, 8:49*pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:46:21 -0700 (PDT), m...@sushi.com wrote:
> >At wifi frequencies, the dimensions are within the range of those
> >"Internet" PCB manufacturers.
>
> Well, yeah. *I think you mean the tolerances, not dimensions.
>
> >Is a PCB trace too thin to make an
> >antenna?
>
> What PCB trace? *Are you thinking of building a PCB driven element or
> balun? *It can easily be done. *For example, here's a 900MHz log
> periodic PCB antenna:
> <http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/Sinclair%20SRL441-2P/index.html>
> Note that the PCB material is polysulfone, not G10/FR4.
>
> Much cheaper are those made by Ramsey for various bands:
> <http://www.ramseyelectronics.com/downloads/catalog/catalog_antenna.pdf>
> <http://k0swi.microlnk.com/REVIEW/ANTENNAS/RAMSEY%20LOGI%20ANTENNAS.htm>
> These are G10/FR4.
>
> The width of the trace acts exactly the same way as the diameter of a
> rod element in a traditional yagi antenna. *The fatter the element,
> the greater the bandwidth. *All a too narrow a trace does is narrow up
> the usable bandwidth.
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann * * je...@cruzio.com
> 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558
Actually, I did mean dimensions. Most of the "internet" PCB fabs limit
themselves to about 22 inches in length