* 1058 and 1030

We keep on getting error in event log on our 2003 Server
DC. The error 1058 Windows caanot access the file
gpt.ini for GPO CN={AED8...} ... The file must be present
at the location... (Access is denied). Group Policy
processing aborted. Then acompanied by error 1030
Windows cannot query for the list of Group Policy
Objects...

This errors keep on recurring every 5 minutes. We tried
fixing it by performing the steps in Knowledge Base
Article 830676 (dfsutil /PurgeMupCache) but it did not
resolve the problem. We also put the following entries
in HOSTS file:
192.168.1.xxx domain.com (first DC)
192.168.1.xxx domain.com (second DC)
but still did not resolve the problem. When we use "net
use * \\server\sharedname" command it prompt us to enter
user id and password, but could not map the network drive.

We searched the Internet and at this point there seems to
be no resolution this problem. Does anyone have any idea?

John

I've seen this occcur on a server with two NICs
and the file and primt sharing disabled on the
external NIC.

"John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1f69f01c457d1$931e89d0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> We keep on getting error in event log on our 2003 Server
> DC. The error 1058 Windows caanot access the file
> gpt.ini for GPO CN={AED8...} ... The file must be present
> at the location... (Access is denied). Group Policy
> processing aborted. Then acompanied by error 1030
> Windows cannot query for the list of Group Policy
> Objects...
>
> This errors keep on recurring every 5 minutes. We tried
> fixing it by performing the steps in Knowledge Base
> Article 830676 (dfsutil /PurgeMupCache) but it did not
> resolve the problem. We also put the following entries
> in HOSTS file:
> 192.168.1.xxx domain.com (first DC)
> 192.168.1.xxx domain.com (second DC)
> but still did not resolve the problem. When we use "net
> use * \\server\sharedname" command it prompt us to enter
> user id and password, but could not map the network drive.
>
> We searched the Internet and at this point there seems to
> be no resolution this problem. Does anyone have any idea?
>
> John